
The Sunshine Protection Act, H.R. 139, now moves to the Senate, where a similar measure stalled in previous sessions. The bill would end the twice-yearly clock change starting in November 2027, allowing states to remain on daylight saving time year-round.
Supporters argue that permanent daylight saving time would reduce traffic accidents, boost retail sales, and improve mental health by increasing evening sunlight. Representative Marcus Reed, a Republican from Ohio and a lead sponsor, said the current system is outdated and disruptive.
Opponents, including some sleep scientists and rural lawmakers, warn that permanent daylight saving time could lead to darker winter mornings, posing risks for schoolchildren and agricultural workers. Representative Linda Chen, a Democrat from California, voted against the bill, citing concerns for northern states where sunrise could occur after 9 a.m.
The Senate has not yet scheduled a vote. If passed, the bill would require states to choose between permanent standard time or permanent daylight saving time, with most states expected to opt for the latter. Several states have already passed laws to adopt permanent daylight saving time pending federal approval.
Highlighted words show why each story was matched

NRI Herald • August 6, 2026

NRI Herald • August 9, 2026

NRI Herald • August 8, 2026

NRI Herald • August 8, 2026